Subject of social memory and the transmission of historicity
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47451/phi2025-04-02Keywords:
epistemologiya of the history, subjects of history, social memory, archetypes, collective unconscious, symbolsAbstract
In the context of the fragmentation of historical perception and the deformation of subjectivity, issues concerning the integrity of historical experience, the transmission of collective identity, and the prognostic functions of historical imagination become particularly relevant. The study subject is the semantic, categorical, and functional aspects of the imaginary as an epistemological phenomenon within historical knowledge, its connection to social memory, subjectivity, and the dialogical structure of the historical process. The study object is the epistemology of history as a distinct field of philosophical inquiry, within which interrelations between historical imagination, social forms of memory, symbolic structures of culture, and the subject of historical action are explored. The study aims to analyse and provide a philosophical and epistemological justification for the role of the imaginary and social memory in shaping a coherent historical consciousness and in the reproduction of historical subjectivity. To achieve the aim and address the set objectives, the study employs a range of scholarly methods, including the hermeneutic method, phenomenological analysis, the epistemological approach, cultural-historical analysis, the comparative-historical method, and the method of critical reflection. The study draws on the works of European, American, and Russian scholars in philosophy. The author examines the interrelations between epistemological discourse and historical subjectivity, identifies the place and role of social memory in this process, and demonstrates that social memory serves as a means of forming the social organism and educational processes. An attempt is made to comprehend the unity of the past, present, and future within a unifying concept of the logical and procedural organisation of history.
Downloads
References
Ankersmit, F. R. (1994). History and Tropology: The Rise and Fall of Metaphor. University of California Press.
Bakhtin, M. V. (2014). Epistemology of Socio-Historical Knowledge (Models of History and Philosophical-Anthropological Representations) [Dissertation on Doctor of Philosophical Sciences, Russian State Pedagogical University]. St. Peterburg. (In Russ.)
Balakhonskaya, L. V., & Balakhonsky, V. V. (2012). The Security of Society: Historical-Philosophical and Theoretical Aspects of Interpretation. Bulletin of Saint Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia: Scientific-Theoretical Journal, 1(53), 278–285. (In Russ.)
Castoriadis, C. (1987). The Imaginary Institution of Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
Domańska, E. (1998). Encounters: Philosophy of History after Postmodernism. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.
Gryakalov, A. A. (2010). Night in the Light of Day: On the Hermeneutics of Subjectivity. Bulletin of Leningrad State University named after A.S. Pushkin. Philosophy, 2(4), 220–221. (In Russ.)
Gusev, S. S. (2003). The Meaning of the Possible: Connotative Semantics. St. Petersburg: Aleteya. (In Russ.)
Makarov, A. I. (2009). The Phenomenon of Supra-Individual Memory: Image – Concept – Identity. Volgograd. (In Russ.)
Mudragey, N. S. (1989). The Middle Ages and Scientific Thought. Problems of Philosophy, 12, 86–89. (In Russ.)
Vattimo, G., & Rorty, R. (2005). The Age of Interpretation. In The Future of Religion (pp. 43-54). Columbia University Press.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 European Scientific e-Journal

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The European Scientific e-Journal (ESEJ) is an open access journal. Articles are available free of charge as PDF files on the website of the European Institute for Innovation Development. PDF files can be previewed with Acrobat Reader from www.adobe.com.
All articles of the “Tuculart Student Scientific” are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic (CC BY 4.0) International license.
According to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic (CC BY 4.0) International license, the users are free to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially (the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms).
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.