Cyclicity in Creation: From Drawing to Memory, from Memory to Drawing

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47451/art2022-05-05

Keywords:

painting, avantgarde, contemporary painting, eady-made, memory, iconic, drawing, monochrome, mixed media, Iasi, Timisoara

Abstract

This study provides a wider view over Romanian contemporary painting from the two national poles of art: Iasi, located in the north-east part of the country and Timisoara, representing the west side of Romania. It is focused on fusing painting and drawing, with an array of works on paper such as drawings, watercolor, altered photographs and mixed media by Smaranda Moldovan and  mixed media portraits on canvas by Ioana Palamar. Both study cases present a microcosmos of the intangible cultural heritage with roots in memory, not a collective one, but an individual one – a long term memory and an iconic memory of landscapes from Romania and France. The study shows the importance of memory in contemporary art, even if it was nominated as a cliche. The authors believe that memory has still not been sufficiently offered as an empirical art research method and that memory combined with the two genders, painting and drawing,  can produce a new and unique repository of imagery.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

  • Ioana Palamar, “George Enescu” National University of Arts (Iasi)

    Doctor in Visual Arts, Assistant Professor, Department of Visual Arts, Faculty of Visual Arts and Design

  • Smaranda-Sabina Moldovan, West University Timisoara

    Doctor in Visual Arts, Assistant Professor, Department of Visual Arts, Faculty of Arts and Design

References

Cabrero, L. (2021, October 11). CfA: Edited Volume on „Intangible Cultural Heritage”. Memory Studies Association. https://www.memorystudiesassociation.org/cfa-edited-volume-intangible-cultural-heritage/

Dick, A. (1974). Iconic memory and its relation to perceptual processing and other memory mechanisms. Perception & Psychophysics, 16, 575596. https://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/BF03198590#citeas

Düchting, S. (2001). Konzeptuelle Selbstbildnisse. Klartext. (In Rom.)

Dună, R. (2010). Eu, autorul: reprezentări auctoriale în literatură şi pictură : din antichitate până în Renaştere. Tracus Arte. (In Rom.)

Enăchescu, C. (2002). Tratat de psihologie morală. Tehnică. (In Rom.)

Freud and Memory: An Exchange. Matthew Hugh Erdelyi (1995, March 23). The New York Review of Books. https://www.nybooks.com/articles/1995/03/23/freud-and-memory-an-exchange/

Guţă, A. (2008). Generaţia ‚80 în artele vizuale. Paralela 45. (In Rom.)

Hockney, D. (2007). Ştiinţa secretă: redescoperind tehnicile uitate ale Vechilor Maeştri. Enciclopedia RAO. (In Rom.)

Stendl, I. (2004). Desenul. Desenul Estetica. Suporturi. Materiale. Semne. (In Rom.)

The Editors of Encyclopedia Britannica. Britannica. (n.d.). Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/editor/The-Editors-of-Encyclopaedia-Britannica/4419

Titu, A. (1997). Experimentul în Arta Românească după 1960. Soros. (In Rom.)

Welchman, J. C. (2016). Past Realization, Volume 1: Essays on Contemporary European Art, XX-XXI (J.C. Welchman, Ed.). MIT Press.

Published

2022-05-30

How to Cite

Cyclicity in Creation: From Drawing to Memory, from Memory to Drawing. (2022). Klironomy, 5, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.47451/art2022-05-05

Similar Articles

1-10 of 32

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.