The Relevance of Klironomy as a Complex of Scientific Knowledge of Cultural Heritage Preservation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47451/her2022-04-01Keywords:
klironomy, klironomical sciences, cultural heritage preservation, humanitarian, natural sciences, social sciences, art historyAbstract
The relevance of the topic Klironomy Relevance as a Complex of Scientific Knowledge of Cultural Heritage Preservation concludes in consideration of klironomy not as a separate science but as a scientific knowledge complex, connected with many sciences from social and humanitarian fields. Despite klironomy includes three fundamental scientific directions, each of them has few sciences, cumulative existing knowledge forming united humanitarian outlook directed to researching of the main tangible and intangible values. Each klironomical science is clearly identified, withal has close connection together and uses knowledge received in adjacent sciences development, e.g., history, philosophy, anthropology, archaeology, physics, chemistry, etc. The study subject is the complex of klironomical sciences. The study object is cultural heritage preservation phenomenon. The study aims to detect interconnection of separate klironomical directions and sciences on example of each direction’s representative. In the study, historical, comparative, and logical analysis and also analyses and synthesis methods were used. To reach the set destination and solve tasks made, the works of the native and foreign specialists in culture, art, philosophy, history, geography, archaeology, and other sciences that help form klironomical outlook. The author concludes that to analyse three separated klironomical sciences each of which is included in separated klironomical direction it was concluded that they are interconnected, complete each other, and present complex and full characteristics to an object, subject, or element of cultural heritage. Thus, it can be concluded that Klironomy as the science of cultural heritage is a set of multiple separated klironomical sciences united in three scientific directions.
Downloads
References
Buychik, A. (2018a). Achievements in the field of social sciences and Humanities in restoration and conservation. Online Electronic Scientific Journal “Vestnik GSU”, 4. Gzhel: Gzhel State University.
Buychik, A. (2018b). Categories and types of objects of historical and cultural heritage on the territory of the Russian Federation. Online Electronic Scientific Journal “Vestnik GSU”, 5. Gzhel: Gzhel State University.
Buychik, A. (2018c). Significance of achievements in the field of natural sciences in the preservation of cultural heritage. Online Electronic Scientific Journal “Vestnik GSU”, 3. Gzhel: Gzhel State University.
Buychik, A. (2019). Klironomy as a Science of Preservation of Cultural Heritage. Mauritius: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.
Buychik, A. (2021). The relevance of the formation of the science of the cultural heritage preservation as the evolution of social and scientific thought. Scientific View on the Modern Problems of Cultural Heritage and Arts in the Context of Social Development. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference. Klironomy, 1(1), 7-21. Hlučín.
Buychik, A. (2014). The story of the restoration of the Great Sphinx in Giza Valley: the relevance of the preservation of world cultural heritage’s monuments. Restoration as the Art of Revival of Historical and Cultural Heritage. The Collection of Articles, 158-170. St. Petersburg: Publishing House “SPbCS”, St. Petersburg Institute of Arts and Restoration. (In Russ.)
Cohen, S. (1973). Destruction of Property: Motives and Meanings. In: Vandalism. London: The Architectural Press.
Devina et al. (2001). Preventive conservation and the issues of the museum microclimate normalization. Report on the International Conference “Researches in Restoration” (December 4-6, 2001). Moscow.
Grenberg, Y. I. (1980). Technological research of wall paintings as a restoration issue. Art Heritage. Keeping, Research, Restoration, 6, 6-27.
Koptseva, N. P., Lozianskaya, V. P., & Makhonina, A. A. (2013). The cultural values issue and its solution in Heinrich Rickert’s philosophy. Philosophy and Culture, 7(67). Moscow. (in Russian)
On the Cultural Heritage Objects (Monuments of History and Culture) of Russian Federation’s Nations. Federal Law No. 73-FZ dated May 24, 2002.
The methods of ruins conservation in the restoration practice (on the example of Tatarstan monuments) (2013). 28th International Distance Scientific and Practical Conference “Technical Sciences – from Theory to Practice”, 28. Novosibirsk.
Vygonnaya, A., Kalnin, V., & Tseitlina, M. (2000). The basics of restoration. Minsk: Design PRO.
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Klironomy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Klironomy is an open access journal. Articles are available free of charge as PDF files on the website of the European Institute for Innovation Development. PDF files can be previewed with Acrobat Reader from www.adobe.com.
All articles of the Klironomy are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic (CC BY 4.0) International license.
According to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic (CC BY 4.0) International license, the users are free to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially (the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms).
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
