Criteria for Evaluating Scientific Posters with Elements of Artificial Intelligence

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47451/phl2025-10-01

Keywords:

education, poster, artificial intelligence, academic integrity

Abstract

Education benefits greatly from visual learning, as visual memory accounts for a significant portion of brain activity. Visual aids such as posters distill complex data and foster dynamic discussions, making them indispensable in academic presentations. Posters are becoming increasingly popular in the educational environment because they allow complex data to be illustrated concisely and comprehensively. However, artificial intelligence (AI) poses certain challenges in the creation and evaluation of posters, raising concerns about academic integrity and personal contribution. The subject of the study is the criteria and methodological approaches used to assess the quality, originality, and academic integrity of posters produced with the assistance of artificial intelligence tools. The object of the study is the process of creating and evaluating scientific posters within the educational environment, particularly those incorporating elements of artificial intelligence. The study aims to develop a unified set of objective criteria for evaluating scientific posters that include AI-generated elements, ensuring ethical compliance, transparency, and fairness in academic assessment practices. This study examines poster evaluation criteria, considering the role of AI, to ensure fairness and transparency in an academic setting. Clear guidelines and requirements for disclosure of AI use are essential for maintaining ethical standards in poster presentations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Liubov Stehnitska, Bukovinian State Medical University (Chernivtsi)

    Candidate of Philological Sciences (Ph.D.), Associate Professor, Department of Foreign Languages

References

Alabi, M. (2024). Visual learning: The power of visual aids and multimedia. ResearchGate. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/385662029_Visual_Learning_The_Power_of_Visual_Aids_and_Multimedia

Balalle, H., & Pannilage, S. (2025). Reassessing academic integrity in the age of AI: A systematic literature review on AI and academic integrity. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 11(1), 101299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101299

Brandt, C. (2009). PowerPoint or posters for EAP students’ presentation skills development? In T. Stewart (Ed.), Insights on teaching speaking in TESOL (pp. 140–153). TESOL International Publications Inc.

Chávez, A. L. C. T., Cordero, C. R. Z., Orellana, L. M. G., Tapia, R. D. C., Aguila, O. E. P., Pérez, L. A. C., Ramírez, A. A. V., Carranza, C. P. M., Velasquez, W. L. V., & Gonzáles, J. L. A. (2023). Impact of artificial intelligence in promoting academic integrity in education: A systematic review. Journal of Namibian Studies: History Politics Culture, 33, 71–85.

Duchin, S., & Sherwood, G. (1990). Posters as an educational strategy. Journal of Continuing Education in Nursing, 21(5), 205–208. https://doi.org/10.3928/0022-0124-19900901-06

Eaton, S. E. (2023). The academic integrity technological arms race and its impact on learning, teaching, and assessment. Canadian Journal of Learning and Technology, 48(2).

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Guidelines for making poster presentations. (n.d.). ECDC Fellowship Programme. https://www.ecdc.europa.eu/sites/default/files/media/en/epiet/Documents/Other%20documents/Annex%2006B_Guidelines%20for%20making%20poster%20presentations.pdf

Frost, M., Goates, M., & Nelson, G. (2023). The benefits of hosting a poster competition in an academic library. College & Research Libraries, 84(4), 495. https://doi.org/10.5860/crl.84.4.495

Harsono, S. Y. R., & Abu Seman, N. A. (2019). The effectiveness of posters as a learning media to improve student learning quality. The Journal of Social Sciences Research, 6(1), 97–103. https://ideas.repec.org/a/arp/tjssrr/2018p757-763.html

Lund, B., Mannuru, N. R., Teel, Z. A., Lee, T. H., Ortega, N. J., Simmons, S., & Ward, E. (2026). Student perceptions of AI-assisted writing and academic integrity: Ethical concerns, academic misconduct, and use of generative AI in higher education. AI in Education, 1, 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/aieduc1010002

Mokgosi, D., & Semenya, L. M. (n.d.). Establishing clear guidelines for AI tools usage in an academic institution. Pixel Online. https://conference.pixel-online.net/files/foe/ed0015/FP/9067-ICT7383-FP-FOE15.pdf

Osa, J. O., & Musser, L. R. (2004). The role of posters in teacher education programs. Education Libraries, 27(1), 16–21. https://doi.org/10.26443/el.v27i1.196

Salbego, N., Heberie, & Gabriela, M. (2015). A visual analysis of English textbooks: Multimodal scaffolded learning. Calidos Caprio, 13(1), 5–13.

Sousa, B. J., & Clark, A. M. (2019). Six insights to make better academic conference posters. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 18. https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406919862370

Tolochko, S. V., Bordyuh, N. S., & Mironets, L. P. (2023). Academic Integrity and Artificial Intelligence in Educational and Scientific Activities. Innovative Pedagogy, 62(2), 25–30. [Толочко, С. В., Бордюг, Н. С., Міронець, Л. П. (2023). Академічна доброчесність та штучний інтелект в освітній і науковій діяльності. Інноваційна педагогіка, 62(2), 25–30]. (In Ukr.). http://www.innovpedagogy.od.ua/archives/2023/62/part_2/4.pdf

Tovar Samanez, C. (1987). El cartel como medio de comunicacion [The poster as a communication medium]. Cuadernos de Comunicación AMIDEP, 1, 33–38. PMID: 12281468. (In Spa.)

Weiner, M., Devoe, S., Rubinow, S., & Geller, J. (1972). Nonverbal behavior and nonverbal communication. Psychological Review, 79, 185–214.

Published

2025-12-15

How to Cite

Criteria for Evaluating Scientific Posters with Elements of Artificial Intelligence. (2025). European Scientific E-Journal, 40, 72–77. https://doi.org/10.47451/phl2025-10-01

Similar Articles

1-10 of 43

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.