The Relevance of Creating a Scientific and Educational Complex for Training Specialists in Revitalization
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47451/her2023-03-01Keywords:
revitalization, cultural heritage, scientific and educational complex, specialist in revitalization, urbanistic, urban renewalAbstract
At the present stage of development of the advanced society of the planet, a more careful attitude to the objects of the past, which have the value of cultural heritage, becomes relevant. One of the problems is the lack of uniform norms for the interpretation of objects as cultural heritage units. Consequently, in each society the fund of such objects is formed according to different principles. Some of these units, which become objects and structures of cultural heritage, fall into significant disrepair or lose harmony with the renewing environment, landscape, and buildings over time. The relevance of their existence or the profitability of their restoration is under threat. The way out of this situation was the process of revitalization, i.e., giving an object or structure a new life while preserving the part of the authentic appearance (exterior) survived to this day. The study subject was the processes of evolution and transformation of klironomical thought in revitalization of cultural heritage objects and objects. The study object was a scientific and educational complex for the revitalization of cultural heritage objects and objects. The study purpose was to identify the evolutionary regularity of the actualisation for creating a scientific and educational complex to train future specialists in revitalization. To achieve the set purpose and solve problems, historical, logical, and comparative methods were used in the study course. In the study course, the works of scientists and researchers in the history of urban planning and architecture, in revitalization, culture and cultural heritage (Klironomy) were used. The author concludes that the study revealed an evolutionary need for the emergence of a new specialty that would represent specialists in revitalization, who will have a broader professional view of the principles, processes and conditions for the revitalization of cultural heritage objects and structures. For the emergence of specialists in revitalization in state, municipal, and commercial structures, it is necessary to create a scientific and educational complex for training specialists on the basis of universities and research institutes that deal with the problems of urbanisation, urban planning, architectural and landscape design. However, the fundamentally distinctive feature of such a scientific and educational complex should be an approach from a klironomical worldview, i.e., the main mental activity of a specialist should be the maximum preservation of the cultural and historical forms of an object or structure and the desire to adapt the environment to the historical appearance of the revitalized object using the latest technologies and new art forms.
Downloads
References
Barabanov, A. A. (2013). Socio-cultural and semantic principles of industrial heritage revitalization. Eco Potential, 3–4, 237–248. (In Russ.)
Buychik, A. (2013). Pedagogical aspect of cultural heritage: new perception of restoration. The Proceedings of the 5th International Scientific and Practical Conference “Education. Science. Culture”, 163–165. November 22, 2013. St. Petersburg. (In Russ.)
Buychik, A. (2015). Philosophical and cultural aspects of cultural heritage preservation: destruction and restoration. Anthology: Culture. Art. Restoration, 1, 19–21. St. Petersburg. (In Russ.)
Buychik, A. (2017). The relevance of the positioning of the restored cultural heritage objects by means of web-design. Online Electronic Scientific Journal “Vestnik GSU”, 3. Gzhel. (In Russ.). https://doicode.ru/doifile/regdoi/2015-2020/Buichik-AG-DOI-3.pdf
Buychik, A. (2019a). Klironomy as a science of preservation of cultural heritage. LAP Lambert Academic Publishing. Mauritius-France-Germany.
Buychik, A. (2019b). Philosophical understanding of the value of historical and cultural heritage. Series of Cognition. Modern Science: Actual Problems of Theory and Practice, 6, 103–106. Moscow. (In Russ.). https://doicode.ru/doifile/regdoi/2015-2020/Buichik-AG-DOI-2.pdf
Buychik, A. (2019c). The problem of formation of klironomy as a science of the preservation of cultural heritage. Science in the Modern World. Collection of publications of the multidisciplinary scientific journal Archivarius in Kiev: collection of articles (standard level, academic level), 12(45), 28–31. Kyiv. https://doi.org/10.31618/2524-0935-2019-45-12-2
Buychik, A. (2020). Allocation of basic research in the field of cultural heritage preservation in a separate scientific direction. Eurasia: Current Issues of Cultural Heritage. European Scientific e-Journal, 3(3), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.47451/her2020-12-005
Buychik, A. (2021). The formation of klironomical thinking in the system of the social outlook. Eastern European Humanitarian Collection of Mini Monographs. European Scientific e-Journal, 1(7), 108–154. https://doi.org/10.47451/phi2020-12-001
Caro, R. (1974). The power broker: Robert Moses and the fall of New York. New York: Knopf.
Caves, R. W. (2004). Encyclopedia of the City. Routledge.
Chigbu, U. E. (2012). Village renewal as an instrument of rural development: evidence from Weyarn, Germany. Community Development, 43(2), 209–224.
Glaeser, E., & Shapiro, J. (2003). City growth: Which places grew and why. In B. Katz & R. Lang (Eds.). Redefining urban and suburban America: Evidence from Census 2000. Volume 1. Washington DC: The Brookings Institution.
Grogan, P., & Proscio, T. (2001). Comeback cities: A blueprint for urban neighborhood revival. Basic Books.
Jackson, K. T. (1985). Crabgrass Frontier: The Suburbanization of the United States. New York: Oxford University Press.
Knight, A. C. (2007). Urban renewal, the 15th ward, the Empire Stateway and the City of Syracuse, New York. Honors Capstone Projects, 590.
Lobbia, J. A. (2008, March 17). Bowery Bummer: Downtown plan will make and break history. The Village Voice.
Lupton, R., & Power, A. (2004). The growth and decline of cities and regions. CASE-Brookings Census Brief, 1.
Pan, J. (2010). The United States outer executive departments and independent establishments & government corporations. Xlibris.
Revitalization (2015, October 7). Electronic Cambridge Dictionary. https://dictionary.cambridge.org/dictionary/english/revitalization
What is urban regeneration? (2021, April 12). NetraTex. https://www.natratex.co.uk/knowledgehub/what-is-urban-regeneration/
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Klironomy
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Klironomy is an open access journal. Articles are available free of charge as PDF files on the website of the European Institute for Innovation Development. PDF files can be previewed with Acrobat Reader from www.adobe.com.
All articles of the Klironomy are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic (CC BY 4.0) International license.
According to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic (CC BY 4.0) International license, the users are free to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially (the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms).
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.
