Documentary Scientific Heritage – Actual Contextual Representation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.47451/her2022-05-02

Keywords:

heritage, historical and cultural heritage, scientific documentary heritage, document, actualisation, social and cultural competence

Abstract

The report analyses the process of the heritage model formation as the choice of different generations of different parts of it. The field of scientific knowledge is considered as a set of systematised objective knowledge accumulated by mankind. The role of science is considered, in which rational, i.e., reasonable, true, reliable knowledge of people about the environment and themselves is concentrated, which is intersubjective, can be shared and translated by people in communicative processes. The significance of cultural heritage, including scientific, is also evaluated, which for new generation is only illustrative information that is not related to current life and requires updating, i.e., rational development in order to be used in solving vital tasks for an individual. The problem of reliable and objective interpretation of historical events and circumstances of scientists’ activities reflected in the submitted documents, letters, diaries, notes, photographs, etc. is revealed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

  • Irina Urmina, Russian State Social University

    Doctor of Cultural Studies, Professor, Faculty of Arts

References

Bogatov, V. V., & Urmina, I. A. (2020). Academician Komarov and his time (to the 150th anniversary of the birth of Academician V.L. Komarov). Vladivostok: Dalnauka. (In Russ.)

Gavrilova, A. A. (2017). Metatext elements in a scientific text. Saratov: SSEI PRUE named after G.V. Plekhanov. (In Russ.)

Hassan, I., & Hassan, S. (Eds.). (1983). Ideas of cultural change. Innovation/Renovation. New Perspectives on the Humanities. Madison.

Kuchmaeva, I. K. (2006). Social patterns and mechanisms of cultural inheritance. Moscow: GASK. (In Russ.)

Lotman, Y. M. (1973). Semiotics of cinema and problems of cinema aesthetics. Tallinn: Eesti Raamat. (In Russ.)

Levi-Strauss, C. (1994). Untamed thought / Primitive thinking. Moscow: Republic. (In Russ.)

Naisbit, J. (2003). Megatrends. Moscow: AST. (In Russ.)

Petrov, M. K. (2004). Language, sign, culture. Moscow: Editorial URSS. (In Russ.)

Selezneva, E. N. (2006). Cultural heritage in the context of macro-historical dynamics. Observatory of Culture: journal-review, 5, 4-11. (In Russ.)

Shapinskaya, E. N. (2016). Culture in the Era of “numbers”: transformation of cultural forms and aesthetic values. International Magazine “Media. Information. Communication”, 19. (In Russ.). http://mic.org.ru/vyp/19-nomer-2016/kultura-v-epokhu-tsifry-transformatsiya-kulturnykh-form-i-esteticheskikh-tsennostey

Urmina, I. A. (2018). Actualization of the documentary scientific heritage in museum and exhibition activities. Collection based on the results of the conference “Documentary Heritage of Russia: Problems of Theory and Practice. To the 100th Anniversary of the State Archival Service of Russia: Proceedings of the Scientific and Practical Conference”, 54-60. Moscow. Archive of the Russian Academy of Sciences. (In Russ.)

Published

2022-05-30

How to Cite

Documentary Scientific Heritage – Actual Contextual Representation. (2022). Klironomy, 5, 114–120. https://doi.org/10.47451/her2022-05-02

Similar Articles

1-10 of 48

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.