The Stedley Art Foundation Collection: Between Private Initiative and The Public-Private Space
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.47451/kj-2025-03Keywords:
private collection, Stedley Art Foundation, public-private space, contemporary art, art institutions, collecting practices, curatorial strategies, institutional critique, cultural representationAbstract
The relevance of this study is determined by the growing role of private art foundations and collections in shaping the contemporary cultural landscape and transforming traditional models of institutional representation of art. In the context of rethinking the boundaries between the private and the public, such initiatives acquire particular significance for art history, museum studies, and cultural theory. The research problem lies in the insufficient scholarly examination of private collections as hybrid institutional forms operating within the public cultural space. Existing studies tend to address either museum institutions or private collecting practices separately, without offering an integrated art-historical analysis of their interaction. The scientific novelty of the study consists in a comprehensive art-historical interpretation of the Stedley Art Foundation collection as a hybrid institutional model situated between private initiative and the public–private space. For the first time, the collection is analysed not only as an assemblage of artworks, but as a dynamic cultural mechanism that generates curatorial narratives, educational contexts, and alternative forms of public access to art. The subject of the study is the set of conceptual, curatorial, and institutional mechanisms through which the Stedley Art Foundation collection functions at the intersection of private collecting and the public cultural environment. The object of the study is the Stedley Art Foundation collection as an integral artistic and institutional phenomenon within contemporary Ukrainian art. The study aims to identify and analyse the specific features of the Stedley Art Foundation as a space in which private collecting initiative intersects with public cultural discourse. The methodological framework of the research is based on art-historical, institutional, comparative, philosophical, and axiological methods, as well as the analysis of curatorial practices, visual narratives, and empirical interview material. The study generalises and critically engages with the works of Ukrainian and international scholars and practitioners, including V. Blikhara, L. Levchuk, B. Pylypushko, V. Sakharuk, G. Poberizhna, K. Tsyhykalo, J.-C. Marcadé, and others, whose research addresses aesthetics, private collecting, institutional critique, and contemporary artistic practices. The research examines the principles of collection formation, curatorial strategies, and models of public representation implemented by the Stedley Art Foundation, with particular attention to the role of ethical and aesthetic values in shaping institutional identity. The collection is interpreted as a meaning-producing space that integrates artistic heritage, contemporary discourse, and public engagement. The study concludes that the Stedley Art Foundation represents an alternative model of an art institution in which private ownership does not limit, but rather expands the possibilities of public cultural communication. The findings demonstrate that such hybrid institutions play an increasingly important role in the development of contemporary art, the transformation of cultural landscapes, and the redefinition of the relationship between private initiative and public responsibility.
Downloads
References
Author’s interview with collector Stella Beniaminova (2025, November 24) [Інтерв’ю автора з колекціонеркою Стеллою Беньяміновою]. (In Ukr.)
Blikhara, V. S. (Ed.). (2018). Ethics and aesthetics: teaching manual (in diagrams and tables) [Етика та естетика: навчально-методичний посібник (у схемах і таблицях)]. Lviv: PP Aral. (In Ukr.)
“Breathing Form”: Oleksandr Sukholit. Your Art [«Форма, що дихає»: Олександр Сухоліт. Your Art]. (2021, February 24). (In Ukr.)
Hlasenko, S. (2020). The house of pure light [Дім чистого світла]. Knyhy–XXI Publishing House.
Levchuk, L. T., Panchenko, V. I., Onishchenko, O. I., & Kucheruk, D. Yu. (2010). Aesthetics: Textbook [Естетика: Підручник]. Kyiv: Center for Educational Literature. (In Ukr.)
Poberizhna, G. I. (2016). J. S. Bach in the context of meta-history [Й.-С. Бах в контексті метаісторії]. Culture and Modernity: Almanac, 1, 73–79. https://journals.uran.ua/kis/article/download/148431/147664
Oksametny, I. (2015). Dychenko’s Mission [Місія Диченка]. Art Ukraine. http://artukraine.com.ua/a/misiya-dichenka1/#.XkpfeCgzZPZ
Oleksandr Dubovyk. Album No. 27 (Album series) [Олександр Дубовик. Альбом № 27 (Cерія альбомів)]. (2023). Kyiv: Stedley Art Foundation.
Pylypushko, B. (2018). “Internal Emigration” of Artists in Totalitarian Reality (Based on the Experience of Oleksandr Aksinin) [«Внутрішня еміграція» митця в умовах тоталітарної дійсності (на прикладі досвіду Олександра Аксініна)] [Dissertation of Candidate of Art History]. Kyiv. (In Ukr.)
Sakharuk, V. (2020). Mykola Trokh: Enfant terrible of Ukrainian photography [Микола Трох. Enfant Terrible української фотографії]. Kyiv.
Tsyhykalo, K., & Marcade, J.-C. (2021). Alexander Dubovik. The Signs [Олександр Дубовик. Знаки]. Kyiv: Stedley Art Foundation.
Yevgeniya, Sh. (2014). Alexander Zhivotkov, Canvas, Wood, Cardboard: Working with Materials, 1984–2014 [Олександр Животков «Полотно, дерево, картон. Робота з матеріалами 1984–2014]. Kyiv. (In Ukr.)
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Klironomy

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
The Klironomy is an open access journal. Articles are available free of charge as PDF files on the website of the European Institute for Innovation Development. PDF files can be previewed with Acrobat Reader from www.adobe.com.
All articles of the Klironomy are published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic (CC BY 4.0) International license.
According to the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Generic (CC BY 4.0) International license, the users are free to Share — copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format for any purpose, even commercially (the licensor cannot revoke these freedoms as long as you follow the license terms).
Under the following terms:
- Attribution — You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
- No additional restrictions — You may not apply legal terms or technological measures that legally restrict others from doing anything the license permits.